You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Hi! There is no particular reason why we didn’t use Kit-ML in our work. There is nothing that could prevent our method from being trained on it. We simply selected HumanML3D because it was bigger, and Babel because provided sequences of actions with distinct textual descriptions.
On 6 Sep 2024 at 11:22 +0200, Suzixin7894946 ***@***.***>, wrote:
Great work! I'd like to ask why the KIT-ML dataset wasn't used in the paper? Is it because this dataset is not suitable for this task?
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or unsubscribe.
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.Message ID: ***@***.***>
Great work! I'd like to ask why the KIT-ML dataset wasn't used in the paper? Is it because this dataset is not suitable for this task?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: