You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I have traditionally used "chia farm summary" to find out the status of a collection of harvesters I have behind a single farmer. However, with plots being in the ~100-400 GB size range, the total size of plots being reported in TiB is okay, but only after I have more than a few plots.
However, if my farm exceeds 1024 TiB, I suddenly get "1.001 PiB" reported. This is not very useful. Sure, if I have a scale that varies by dozens or hundreds of TiB at a time, that's fine, but having ~1000 TiB I lose a lot of useful information there.
If there isn't already a way, I think "farm summary", and any other informative output commands, should have a "-B" type option like GNU df. Or some other way to specify the scale of size numbers reported.
reacted with thumbs up emoji reacted with thumbs down emoji reacted with laugh emoji reacted with hooray emoji reacted with confused emoji reacted with heart emoji reacted with rocket emoji reacted with eyes emoji
-
I have traditionally used "chia farm summary" to find out the status of a collection of harvesters I have behind a single farmer. However, with plots being in the ~100-400 GB size range, the total size of plots being reported in TiB is okay, but only after I have more than a few plots.
However, if my farm exceeds 1024 TiB, I suddenly get "1.001 PiB" reported. This is not very useful. Sure, if I have a scale that varies by dozens or hundreds of TiB at a time, that's fine, but having ~1000 TiB I lose a lot of useful information there.
If there isn't already a way, I think "farm summary", and any other informative output commands, should have a "-B" type option like GNU df. Or some other way to specify the scale of size numbers reported.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions