Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Issue]: mixtral 8x7b fp8 tp1 performance degraded with aiter #91

Open
andyluo7 opened this issue Feb 5, 2025 · 1 comment
Open

[Issue]: mixtral 8x7b fp8 tp1 performance degraded with aiter #91

andyluo7 opened this issue Feb 5, 2025 · 1 comment

Comments

@andyluo7
Copy link

andyluo7 commented Feb 5, 2025

Problem Description

With rocm/vllm-dev:nightly_aiter_intergration_final_20250130, mixtral 8x7B fp8 tp1 throughput dropped from 9100tks to 7500tks with aiter vs without aiter.

Operating System

OS: NAME="Ubuntu" VERSION="22.04.2 LTS (Jammy Jellyfish)"

CPU

Intel(R) Xeon(R) Platinum 8480C

GPU

AMD Instinct MI300X

ROCm Version

ROCm 6.3.1

ROCm Component

No response

Steps to Reproduce

with aiter:

export VLLM_USE_TRITON_FLASH_ATTN=0
export VLLM_USE_AITER=1

python3 /app/vllm/benchmarks/benchmark_throughput.py
--model /models/Mixtral-8x7B-Instruct-v0.1-FP8-KV
--distributed-executor-backend mp
--quantization fp8
--kv-cache-dtype fp8
--dtype bfloat16
--gpu-memory-utilization 0.90
--num-scheduler-steps 10
--max-model-len 8192
--max-num-batched-tokens 32768
--input-len 128
--output-len 128
--tensor-parallel-size 1
--num-prompts 30000
--max-num-seqs 2048 --block_size 16

without aiter:

export VLLM_USE_TRITON_FLASH_ATTN=0
export VLLM_USE_AITER=0

python3 /app/vllm/benchmarks/benchmark_throughput.py
--model /models/Mixtral-8x7B-Instruct-v0.1-FP8-KV
--distributed-executor-backend mp
--quantization fp8
--kv-cache-dtype fp8
--dtype float16
--gpu-memory-utilization 0.90
--num-scheduler-steps 10
--max-model-len 8192
--max-num-batched-tokens 32768
--input-len 128
--output-len 128
--tensor-parallel-size 1
--num-prompts 30000
--max-num-seqs 2048

(Optional for Linux users) Output of /opt/rocm/bin/rocminfo --support

No response

Additional Information

No response

@valarLip
Copy link
Collaborator

valarLip commented Feb 7, 2025

aiter's fused moe currently not include big tile M to support cases with bs>256, so perf will dropped for these cases...

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants