We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
With this wkt: MULTIPOLYGON(((2 8,2 9,3 8,2 8)),((7 1,7 2,8 1,7 1)),((5 2,5 3,6 2,5 2)),((2 2,2 3,3 3,2 2)),((1 3,1 4,2 4,1 3)),((6 4,6 5,7 4,6 4)),((9 8,8 8,9 9,9 8)),((9 8,9 7,8 7,9 8)))
MULTIPOLYGON(((2 8,2 9,3 8,2 8)),((7 1,7 2,8 1,7 1)),((5 2,5 3,6 2,5 2)),((2 2,2 3,3 3,2 2)),((1 3,1 4,2 4,1 3)),((6 4,6 5,7 4,6 4)),((9 8,8 8,9 9,9 8)),((9 8,9 7,8 7,9 8)))
And with miter, buffer distance 1.0 (as in recursive_polygons_buffer.cpp where this case comes from)
1.0
recursive_polygons_buffer.cpp
There is one turn discarded because it is a start turn.
See next picture, turn 0 is discarded because of 1 - but it should not.
0
1
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
barendgehrels
No branches or pull requests
With this wkt:
MULTIPOLYGON(((2 8,2 9,3 8,2 8)),((7 1,7 2,8 1,7 1)),((5 2,5 3,6 2,5 2)),((2 2,2 3,3 3,2 2)),((1 3,1 4,2 4,1 3)),((6 4,6 5,7 4,6 4)),((9 8,8 8,9 9,9 8)),((9 8,9 7,8 7,9 8)))
And with miter, buffer distance
1.0
(as inrecursive_polygons_buffer.cpp
where this case comes from)There is one turn discarded because it is a start turn.
See next picture, turn
0
is discarded because of1
- but it should not.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: