You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Without the table we could use a larger bit width for off_t. And we should review every function to make sure it respects the size limits. Te refactoring of the top level rfc rules may have invalidated existing checks for limits.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I'm pretty sure there are a few loose ends where we don't correctly check for overflow when performing unsigned arithmetic. I tried to get edit_segments and edit_params right, maybe you want to look at them and see if they are correct and sufficiently tested?
Without the table we could use a larger bit width for
off_t
. And we should review every function to make sure it respects the size limits. Te refactoring of the top level rfc rules may have invalidated existing checks for limits.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: