From 840537f9324632372ae08da9db2268e209b0c8b3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Hugo Gruson Date: Thu, 1 Feb 2024 10:55:10 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] Clarify that aut can be used instead of rev --- contribution-acknowledgements.qmd | 2 ++ 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) diff --git a/contribution-acknowledgements.qmd b/contribution-acknowledgements.qmd index fc848bd..94d30cb 100644 --- a/contribution-acknowledgements.qmd +++ b/contribution-acknowledgements.qmd @@ -59,6 +59,8 @@ Reviewers are an example of non-code contributions that plays a crucial role in [The practice of including reviewers as contributors in package `DESCRIPTION` was spearheaded by rOpenSci](https://ropensci.org/blog/2018/03/16/thanking-reviewers-in-metadata/). This explicitly acknowledges in a standard way the efforts of individuals or organizations responsible for reviewing parts of the package. +However, if a reviewer has made a significant contribution to the package through their comments or suggestions, they should be directly credited as an author (`"aut"`) in `DESCRIPTION`. + ## Conclusion By recognizing various levels and types of code or non-code contributions, and acknowledging the role of reviewers, we create a culture of appreciation and inclusivity within our package development process. This fosters a collaborative environment where individuals feel valued for their contributions, regardless of the scale or nature of their involvement.