-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Ensure that now-present chain identifiers in the GOA GPIs are correctly propagated #123
Comments
@pgaudet These identifiers do not seem to appear in my load created on 2025-01-31. Could you confirm the date and location, just to be sure? |
@pgaudet @vanaukenk I'm not sure what project this should belong to; I've temporarily added it to the pipeline/data QC rolling project. Please feel free to move it. |
That seems right. The latest 'official' file according to our yaml is timestamped 2024-12-21 17:57 The new files for the future GOC-GOA data exchange pipeline do contain the chains, if you want to test. Thanks, Pascale |
@pgaudet Okay, I had assumed that these were in the "main" GAFs and GPIs we were picking up, but this looks like it's a little more in-progress, for the future. |
… into smaller ones; for testing geneontology/neo#123 and #407
… into smaller ones; for testing geneontology/neo#123 and geneontology/pipeline#407
Sounds good ! |
Well, thinking through this, even going through the new pipeline, as it doesn't examine GPI files, there is no real test. Can I confirm with you that it only affect GPI files? Is it only new entities added, with no change in current entities (give or take)? |
The only existing entities that I can think of are the Sars-Cov genes, for which we had somehow loaded chains back in 2020. |
Recently, GOA started supplying chain identifiers in their GPIs this ticket is to ensure that they are
An example would be:
UniProtKB:A0A3B3IS91-PRO_0000454209
tagging @pgaudet @vanaukenk
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: