You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
There are a number of lineage validity rules we want to introduce about what references are allowed to be made within different parts of lineage definitions. An example we've known for a while is that we may want to disallow references to any types defined outside of the schema from within a schema, as it introduces the possibility of subtly breaking thema's guarantees when the referenced type gets changed.
This issue is intended as a running list of such rules. Membership on the list does not mean the rule is finally decided - more of a proposal.
#Lens children MUST NOT contain references to anything outside the scope of the lens itself
#Lens.result children MUST NOT contain references to the lacunas section in that lens. (#Lens.lacunas children MAY contain references to the result section.)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
There are a number of lineage validity rules we want to introduce about what references are allowed to be made within different parts of lineage definitions. An example we've known for a while is that we may want to disallow references to any types defined outside of the schema from within a schema, as it introduces the possibility of subtly breaking thema's guarantees when the referenced type gets changed.
This issue is intended as a running list of such rules. Membership on the list does not mean the rule is finally decided - more of a proposal.
#Lens
children MUST NOT contain references to anything outside the scope of the lens itself#Lens.result
children MUST NOT contain references to thelacunas
section in that lens. (#Lens.lacunas
children MAY contain references to theresult
section.)The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: