You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
My system has around 1200 atoms. I set up a molecular dynamic simulation using the GFNFF force field and launch xTB using:
(xtb version 6.7.1 (43a0e4e) compiled by 'runner@fv-az1269-365' on 2024-09-19)
This job was run in my notebook that has 20 cores. After launching the script, I change the job to the highest priority using nice -20 for each of the parallel processes.
The image below show that all the processes are running in nice -20 but each core occupancy is well below 20%.
Is there a way to increase the job performance in a way that the cores are used more efficiently?
reacted with thumbs up emoji reacted with thumbs down emoji reacted with laugh emoji reacted with hooray emoji reacted with confused emoji reacted with heart emoji reacted with rocket emoji reacted with eyes emoji
-
Hello.
My system has around 1200 atoms. I set up a molecular dynamic simulation using the
GFNFF
force field and launchxTB
using:(xtb version 6.7.1 (43a0e4e) compiled by 'runner@fv-az1269-365' on 2024-09-19)
This job was run in my notebook that has 20 cores. After launching the script, I change the job to the highest priority using
nice -20
for each of the parallel processes.The image below show that all the processes are running in
nice -20
but each core occupancy is well below 20%.Is there a way to increase the job performance in a way that the cores are used more efficiently?
Best,
Camps
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions