Replies: 2 comments
-
@reverse-hash I've been using "lightweight" git tags rather than "annotated" tags. The command you posted only works for annotated tags. Sorry about this. If you want to see signatures for various commits, you can do so with |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
-
Thank you I'm still learning
…On Tue, Apr 18, 2023, 10:13 AM Dan Janosik ***@***.***> wrote:
@reverse-hash <https://github.com/reverse-hash> I've been using
"lightweight" git tags rather than "annotated" tags. The command you posted
only works for annotated tags. Sorry about this. If you want to see
signatures for various commits, you can do so with git log
--show-signature.
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#505 (comment)>,
or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/A3ZETISXRWC6QPQEWSPL4U3XB24TBANCNFSM6AAAAAAUGYMTJM>
.
You are receiving this because you commented.Message ID:
***@***.***
com>
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
-
Hi janoside,
I'm working on a project to deploy automatically a bitcoin node with docker and I'm missing a way to verify the repo.
I was trying to verify locally the tag v3.3.0 but it seems is not possible, the tag was not included... and cosidering that the release files (zip and tar.gz) are created by Github, I think there is no way to verify the signatures... or I'm wrong?
This is why a get after importing your public key from keybase.
Please, can you provide a way to verify the repo? Ty!
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions