Is the "base" option from the Astro configuration supported?

[rumenpetrov]

I don't see anything in the documentation about this but I was wandering is the base option covered in this library because I am having problems making my application work with it?

Here are some details about my app:

• It's static
• I am using github to host it, this is why I need the base option
• I am also using lit and and prefetch

Here is how my config looks like

import { defineConfig } from 'astro/config';
import { i18n, defaultLocaleSitemapFilter } from 'astro-i18n-aut/integration';
import lit from '@astrojs/lit';
import prefetch from '@astrojs/prefetch';

const defaultLocale = 'bg';
const locales = {
  bg: 'bg-BG',
  en: 'en-US',
};

// https://astro.build/config
export default defineConfig({
  site: 'https://rumenpetrov.github.io',
  output: 'static',
  trailingSlash: 'always',
  build: {
    format: 'directory',
  },
  base: '/holiday-planner',
  integrations: [
    lit(),
    prefetch(),
    i18n({
      locales,
      // defaultLocale and redirectDefaultLocale are in middleware.js as well
      defaultLocale,
      redirectDefaultLocale: true,
    }),
  ],
});

[jlarmstrongiv]

If you follow Astro convention, you should only have .astro pages in the pages directory, which means that all of the import paths for images, content, and components should stay the same. I was careful to:

• support the srcDir option
• support the base option

But, there may be a bug with the implementation. Do you have an example on GitHub I could take a look at? Maybe injectPages already prepends the base, so I don’t need to add it there.

Or did you get it to work? I see https://github.com/rumenpetrov/holiday-planner hosted on https://rumenpetrov.github.io/holiday-planner/en/ seems to work fine.

Astro does require you to prepend your links and urls manually:

<a href="/docs/about/">About</a>
<img src=`${import.meta.env.BASE_URL}image.png`>

[jlarmstrongiv]

@rumenpetrov following up, you may be running into #21

[rumenpetrov]

@jlarmstrongiv thank you for the feedback I assumed that I was doing something wrong, this is why I wanted to confirm that the library supports the base option.
At the end I decided to pick a different library because I had time constraints but I could give it another try in future. I really liked the approach of this library.

[jlarmstrongiv]

@rumenpetrov base path support has been fixed in 0.3.5 👍 it should work the next time you try it