You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
we are keying the references object by label, but the label that is populated from our DOI transforms is directly taken from the DOI resolution i.e. is not guaranteed to be unique.
It seems to me that we should want our labels to be unique, and there's no need for them to be "small" when they're coming from DOIs. So, unless we consider it a feature to be able to do e.g.
See @10.1107/S0567739469001045, i.e. @Hoppe_1969
we could/should just use the identifier (DOI itself) as the label.
Description
The following citation
seems to break the DOI linker -- resulting in a duplicate citation:
Note the two dois resolve properly using the tool at the bottom of https://www.doi.org/
Additional notes
Contacted @rowanc1 re: this, was prompted to open issue for tracking.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: