You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
first of all thanks for keeping this invaluable package up to date!
So far I have worked with LaTeX, and now with HTML tables I noticed that the asterisks are quite tiny and I already confused them with dust on my screen, which might become dangerous.
While examining the code, I noticed that the asterisks are encoded with <sup>*</sup>. In an own HTML table I coded myself I didn't use sup and it looks much better. May I therefore suggest that you just delete the sup?
But judge for yourself, the first figure shows original htmlreg result, in the second image I edited the HTML code and deleted the sup. I also changed the font size of the note slightly from .8 to .85 <td style="font-size: 0.85em;" colspan="2">***p < 0.001; **p < 0.01; *p < 0.05</td>.
It would be great if you could have a look at this, thanks!
Hi there,
first of all thanks for keeping this invaluable package up to date!
So far I have worked with LaTeX, and now with HTML tables I noticed that the asterisks are quite tiny and I already confused them with dust on my screen, which might become dangerous.
While examining the code, I noticed that the asterisks are encoded with
<sup>*</sup>
. In an own HTML table I coded myself I didn't usesup
and it looks much better. May I therefore suggest that you just delete thesup
?But judge for yourself, the first figure shows original
htmlreg
result, in the second image I edited the HTML code and deleted thesup
. I also changed the font size of the note slightly from .8 to .85<td style="font-size: 0.85em;" colspan="2">***p < 0.001; **p < 0.01; *p < 0.05</td>
.It would be great if you could have a look at this, thanks!
Cheers!
MWE:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: