Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

userspace pm: subflows counter: not updated when a subflows is removed from the other end #492

Open
matttbe opened this issue May 23, 2024 · 0 comments
Labels

Comments

@matttbe
Copy link
Member

matttbe commented May 23, 2024

It looks like the subflow counter is not updated when the other end initiates the removal of a subflow, e.g. after having received a RM_ADDR:

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/net/mptcp/mptcp_join.sh b/tools/testing/selftests/net/mptcp/mptcp_join.sh
index 2b66c5fa71eb..424745490b78 100755
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/net/mptcp/mptcp_join.sh
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/net/mptcp/mptcp_join.sh
@@ -3338,17 +3335,19 @@ userspace_tests()
        if reset_with_events "userspace pm add & remove address" &&
           continue_if mptcp_lib_has_file '/proc/sys/net/mptcp/pm_type'; then
                set_userspace_pm $ns1
-               pm_nl_set_limits $ns2 2 2
+               pm_nl_set_limits $ns2 2 5
+               pm_nl_add_endpoint $ns2 10.0.1.2 flags subflow,fullmesh
+               pm_nl_add_endpoint $ns2 10.0.2.2 flags subflow,fullmesh
                speed=5 \
                        run_tests $ns1 $ns2 10.0.1.1 &
                local tests_pid=$!
                wait_mpj $ns1
                userspace_pm_add_addr $ns1 10.0.2.1 10
                userspace_pm_add_addr $ns1 10.0.3.1 20
-               chk_join_nr 2 2 2
+               chk_join_nr 5 5 5
                chk_add_nr 2 2
-               chk_mptcp_info subflows 2 subflows 2
-               chk_subflows_total 3 3
+               chk_mptcp_info subflows 5 subflows 5
+               chk_subflows_total 6 6
                chk_mptcp_info add_addr_signal 2 add_addr_accepted 2
                userspace_pm_chk_dump_addr "${ns1}" \
                        $'id 10 flags signal 10.0.2.1\nid 20 flags signal 10.0.3.1' \
@@ -3356,15 +3355,13 @@ userspace_tests()
                userspace_pm_chk_get_addr "${ns1}" "10" "id 10 flags signal 10.0.2.1"
                userspace_pm_chk_get_addr "${ns1}" "20" "id 20 flags signal 10.0.3.1"
                userspace_pm_rm_addr $ns1 10
-               userspace_pm_rm_sf $ns1 "::ffff:10.0.2.1" $MPTCP_LIB_EVENT_SUB_ESTABLISHED
                userspace_pm_chk_dump_addr "${ns1}" \
                        "id 20 flags signal 10.0.3.1" "after rm_addr 10"
                userspace_pm_rm_addr $ns1 20
-               userspace_pm_rm_sf $ns1 10.0.3.1 $MPTCP_LIB_EVENT_SUB_ESTABLISHED
                userspace_pm_chk_dump_addr "${ns1}" "" "after rm_addr 20"
-               chk_rm_nr 2 2 invert
-               chk_mptcp_info subflows 0 subflows 0
-               chk_subflows_total 1 1
+               chk_rm_nr 2 0 invert
+               chk_mptcp_info subflows 1 subflows 1
+               chk_subflows_total 2 2
                kill_events_pids
                mptcp_lib_kill_wait $tests_pid
        fi

We get the following errors:

mptcp_info subflows=1:1             [FAIL] got 5:1 subflows:subflows expected 1:1
mptcp_info subflows_total=2:2       [FAIL] got 6:2 subflows_total:subflows_total expected 2:2

The counter should be the same on each side.

I don't know why this test sends 2 remove address, each time followed by the removal of the subflow: this hid the bug. I suggest removing only one subflow, not the two of them. @geliangtang: WDYT?

We are certainly missing some actions when a subflow is removed, e.g. retry if we are under the limit, etc.

(Note: I modified the test to validate https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/mptcp/patch/[email protected]/ : this patch is needed not to have errors with chk_rm_nr 2 0 invert)

@matttbe matttbe added the bug label May 23, 2024
matttbe pushed a commit that referenced this issue Jun 17, 2024
Add a test case for the jmp32/k fix to ensure selftests have coverage.

Before fix:

  # ./vmtest.sh -- ./test_progs -t verifier_or_jmp32_k
  [...]
  ./test_progs -t verifier_or_jmp32_k
  tester_init:PASS:tester_log_buf 0 nsec
  process_subtest:PASS:obj_open_mem 0 nsec
  process_subtest:PASS:specs_alloc 0 nsec
  run_subtest:PASS:obj_open_mem 0 nsec
  run_subtest:FAIL:unexpected_load_success unexpected success: 0
  #492/1   verifier_or_jmp32_k/or_jmp32_k: bit ops + branch on unknown value:FAIL
  #492     verifier_or_jmp32_k:FAIL
  Summary: 0/0 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 1 FAILED

After fix:

  # ./vmtest.sh -- ./test_progs -t verifier_or_jmp32_k
  [...]
  ./test_progs -t verifier_or_jmp32_k
  #492/1   verifier_or_jmp32_k/or_jmp32_k: bit ops + branch on unknown value:OK
  #492     verifier_or_jmp32_k:OK
  Summary: 1/1 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 0 FAILED

Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <[email protected]>
Acked-by: John Fastabend <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <[email protected]>
matttbe pushed a commit that referenced this issue Dec 20, 2024
The SVM DMA device map direction should be set the same as
the DMA unmap setting, otherwise the DMA core will report
the following warning.

Before finialize this solution, there're some discussion on
the DMA mapping type(stream-based or coherent) in this KFD
migration case, followed by https://lore.kernel.org/all/04d4ab32
[email protected]/T/.

As there's no dma_sync_single_for_*() in the DMA buffer accessed
that because this migration operation should be sync properly and
automatically. Give that there's might not be a performance problem
in various cache sync policy of DMA sync. Therefore, in order to
simplify the DMA direction setting alignment, let's set the DMA map
direction as BIDIRECTIONAL.

[  150.834218] WARNING: CPU: 8 PID: 1812 at kernel/dma/debug.c:1028 check_unmap+0x1cc/0x930
[  150.834225] Modules linked in: amdgpu(OE) amdxcp drm_exec(OE) gpu_sched drm_buddy(OE) drm_ttm_helper(OE) ttm(OE) drm_suballoc_helper(OE) drm_display_helper(OE) drm_kms_helper(OE) i2c_algo_bit rpcsec_gss_krb5 auth_rpcgss nfsv4 nfs lockd grace netfs xt_conntrack xt_MASQUERADE nf_conntrack_netlink xfrm_user xfrm_algo iptable_nat xt_addrtype iptable_filter br_netfilter nvme_fabrics overlay nfnetlink_cttimeout nfnetlink openvswitch nsh nf_conncount nf_nat nf_conntrack nf_defrag_ipv6 nf_defrag_ipv4 libcrc32c bridge stp llc sch_fq_codel intel_rapl_msr amd_atl intel_rapl_common snd_hda_codec_realtek snd_hda_codec_generic snd_hda_scodec_component snd_hda_codec_hdmi snd_hda_intel snd_intel_dspcfg edac_mce_amd snd_pci_acp6x snd_hda_codec snd_acp_config snd_hda_core snd_hwdep snd_soc_acpi kvm_amd sunrpc snd_pcm kvm binfmt_misc snd_seq_midi crct10dif_pclmul snd_seq_midi_event ghash_clmulni_intel sha512_ssse3 snd_rawmidi nls_iso8859_1 sha256_ssse3 sha1_ssse3 snd_seq aesni_intel snd_seq_device crypto_simd snd_timer cryptd input_leds
[  150.834310]  wmi_bmof serio_raw k10temp rapl snd sp5100_tco ipmi_devintf soundcore ccp ipmi_msghandler cm32181 industrialio mac_hid msr parport_pc ppdev lp parport efi_pstore drm(OE) ip_tables x_tables pci_stub crc32_pclmul nvme ahci libahci i2c_piix4 r8169 nvme_core i2c_designware_pci realtek i2c_ccgx_ucsi video wmi hid_generic cdc_ether usbnet usbhid hid r8152 mii
[  150.834354] CPU: 8 PID: 1812 Comm: rocrtst64 Tainted: G           OE      6.10.0-custom #492
[  150.834358] Hardware name: AMD Majolica-RN/Majolica-RN, BIOS RMJ1009A 06/13/2021
[  150.834360] RIP: 0010:check_unmap+0x1cc/0x930
[  150.834363] Code: c0 4c 89 4d c8 e8 34 bf 86 00 4c 8b 4d c8 4c 8b 45 c0 48 8b 4d b8 48 89 c6 41 57 4c 89 ea 48 c7 c7 80 49 b4 84 e8 b4 81 f3 ff <0f> 0b 48 c7 c7 04 83 ac 84 e8 76 ba fc ff 41 8b 76 4c 49 8d 7e 50
[  150.834365] RSP: 0018:ffffaac5023739e0 EFLAGS: 00010086
[  150.834368] RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: ffffffff8566a2e0 RCX: 0000000000000027
[  150.834370] RDX: ffff8f6a8f621688 RSI: 0000000000000001 RDI: ffff8f6a8f621680
[  150.834372] RBP: ffffaac502373a30 R08: 00000000000000c9 R09: ffffaac502373850
[  150.834373] R10: ffffaac502373848 R11: ffffffff84f46328 R12: ffffaac502373a40
[  150.834375] R13: ffff8f6741045330 R14: ffff8f6741a77700 R15: ffffffff84ac831b
[  150.834377] FS:  00007faf0fc94c00(0000) GS:ffff8f6a8f600000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
[  150.834379] CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
[  150.834381] CR2: 00007faf0b600020 CR3: 000000010a52e000 CR4: 0000000000350ef0
[  150.834383] Call Trace:
[  150.834385]  <TASK>
[  150.834387]  ? show_regs+0x6d/0x80
[  150.834393]  ? __warn+0x8c/0x140
[  150.834397]  ? check_unmap+0x1cc/0x930
[  150.834400]  ? report_bug+0x193/0x1a0
[  150.834406]  ? handle_bug+0x46/0x80
[  150.834410]  ? exc_invalid_op+0x1d/0x80
[  150.834413]  ? asm_exc_invalid_op+0x1f/0x30
[  150.834420]  ? check_unmap+0x1cc/0x930
[  150.834425]  debug_dma_unmap_page+0x86/0x90
[  150.834431]  ? srso_return_thunk+0x5/0x5f
[  150.834435]  ? rmap_walk+0x28/0x50
[  150.834438]  ? srso_return_thunk+0x5/0x5f
[  150.834441]  ? remove_migration_ptes+0x79/0x80
[  150.834445]  ? srso_return_thunk+0x5/0x5f
[  150.834448]  dma_unmap_page_attrs+0xfa/0x1d0
[  150.834453]  svm_range_dma_unmap_dev+0x8a/0xf0 [amdgpu]
[  150.834710]  svm_migrate_ram_to_vram+0x361/0x740 [amdgpu]
[  150.834914]  svm_migrate_to_vram+0xa8/0xe0 [amdgpu]
[  150.835111]  svm_range_set_attr+0xff2/0x1450 [amdgpu]
[  150.835311]  svm_ioctl+0x4a/0x50 [amdgpu]
[  150.835510]  kfd_ioctl_svm+0x54/0x90 [amdgpu]
[  150.835701]  kfd_ioctl+0x3c2/0x530 [amdgpu]
[  150.835888]  ? __pfx_kfd_ioctl_svm+0x10/0x10 [amdgpu]
[  150.836075]  ? srso_return_thunk+0x5/0x5f
[  150.836080]  ? tomoyo_file_ioctl+0x20/0x30
[  150.836086]  __x64_sys_ioctl+0x9c/0xd0
[  150.836091]  x64_sys_call+0x1219/0x20d0
[  150.836095]  do_syscall_64+0x51/0x120
[  150.836098]  entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e
[  150.836102] RIP: 0033:0x7faf0f11a94f
[  150.836105] Code: 00 48 89 44 24 18 31 c0 48 8d 44 24 60 c7 04 24 10 00 00 00 48 89 44 24 08 48 8d 44 24 20 48 89 44 24 10 b8 10 00 00 00 0f 05 <41> 89 c0 3d 00 f0 ff ff 77 1f 48 8b 44 24 18 64 48 2b 04 25 28 00
[  150.836107] RSP: 002b:00007ffeced26bc0 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000010
[  150.836110] RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 000055c683528fb0 RCX: 00007faf0f11a94f
[  150.836112] RDX: 00007ffeced26c60 RSI: 00000000c0484b20 RDI: 0000000000000003
[  150.836114] RBP: 00007ffeced26c50 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000001
[  150.836115] R10: 0000000000000032 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 000055c683528bd0
[  150.836117] R13: 0000000000000000 R14: 0000000000000021 R15: 0000000000000000
[  150.836122]  </TASK>
[  150.836124] ---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]---

Signed-off-by: Prike Liang <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Felix Kuehling <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant