You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Either for separators to be able to have their own colours set in the config, or for the tail end ones (ie. the left separator for A, and the right separator for Z) to respect the background set for NeoVim.
Although the latter seems like the one that'd be easiest for users to deal with, I don't know how feasible that would be in regards to the highlight system NeoVim uses.
The outer separators for sections A and Z still have a visible background that's the same color as the text for the highlight itself, which makes it looks like it's not quite there yet:
In this case it's not extremely noticeable, because the glyph itself takes up most of the character space, but for Powerline symbols like \ue0ba it's quite jarring, especially if your terminal background is translucent:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Requested feature
Either for separators to be able to have their own colours set in the config, or for the tail end ones (ie. the left separator for A, and the right separator for Z) to respect the background set for NeoVim.
Although the latter seems like the one that'd be easiest for users to deal with, I don't know how feasible that would be in regards to the highlight system NeoVim uses.
Motivation
In the case of my config:
The outer separators for sections A and Z still have a visible background that's the same color as the text for the highlight itself, which makes it looks like it's not quite there yet:
In this case it's not extremely noticeable, because the glyph itself takes up most of the character space, but for Powerline symbols like
\ue0ba
it's quite jarring, especially if your terminal background is translucent:The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: