[PRE REVIEW]: Shell-model study of 58Ni using quantum computing algorithm

[editorialbot]

Submitting author: @BhartiBhoy (Bharti Bhoy)
Repository: https://github.com/BhartiBhoy/QuantComp_58Ni.git
Branch with paper.md (empty if default branch): master
Version: v1.0.0
Editor: Pending
Reviewers: Pending
Managing EiC: Arfon Smith

Status

Status badge code:

HTML: <a href="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/d6de4b1ca0557110dc77259d73127512"><img src="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/d6de4b1ca0557110dc77259d73127512/status.svg"></a>
Markdown: [![status](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/d6de4b1ca0557110dc77259d73127512/status.svg)](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/d6de4b1ca0557110dc77259d73127512)

Author instructions

Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @BhartiBhoy. Currently, there isn't a JOSS editor assigned to your paper.

@BhartiBhoy if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread (without tagging them with an @). You can search the list of people that have already agreed to review and may be suitable for this submission.

Editor instructions

The JOSS submission bot @editorialbot is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @editorialbot can do for you type:

@editorialbot commands

[editorialbot]

Hello human, I'm @editorialbot, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks.

For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:

@editorialbot commands

For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:

@editorialbot generate pdf

[editorialbot]

Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):

✅ OK DOIs

- 10.1088/1367-2630/ad5756 is OK

🟡 SKIP DOIs

- None

❌ MISSING DOIs

- None

❌ INVALID DOIs

- https://doi.org/10.3390/books978-3-0365-9505-4 is INVALID because of 'https://doi.org/' prefix

[editorialbot]

Software report:

github.com/AlDanial/cloc v 1.98  T=0.02 s (721.2 files/s, 67067.5 lines/s)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Language                     files          blank        comment           code
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Python                           8            211             74            703
Markdown                         2             25              0             74
TeX                              1              2              0             23
Text                             1              0              0              4
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUM:                            12            238             74            804
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Commit count by author:

    47	BhartiBhoy
     1	Bharti Bhoy

[editorialbot]

⚠️ An error happened when generating the pdf.

[editorialbot]

Paper file info:

📄 Wordcount for paper.md is 370

✅ The paper includes a Statement of need section

[editorialbot]

License info:

🔴 Failed to discover a valid open source license

[arfon]

@editorialbot query scope

[editorialbot]

Submission flagged for editorial review.

[arfon]

@BhartiBhoy – many thanks for your submission to JOSS. On first check, this submission looks like it might not be eligible to be published in JOSS as it seems to be very focused on a single scenario, has results (which we don't publish here), and is limited code contributions. I'll also note there isn't an open source license here.