Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Deprecate this package #136

Open
displague opened this issue May 24, 2023 · 0 comments
Open

Deprecate this package #136

displague opened this issue May 24, 2023 · 0 comments

Comments

@displague
Copy link
Member

Packet Python is a hand maintained SDK managed by Equinix employees and the community of users. This SDK has been used by Packet and Equinix Metal users and developers for various integrations including the Packet and Metal Ansible Collections.

With the acquisition of Packet by Equinix and the relaunching of Packet's service as Equinix Metal, the name "packet-python" is showing its age. Additionally, the scope of services offered by Equinix Metal has expanded beyond the rate of contributions to this repo.

The Equinix Metal API's published API Spec has been evolving in this time. It is now ready to be used in generated SDKs and those SDKs are proving ready for integrations like Ansible, Cluster API, the Metal CLI, and Terraform.

Metal Python is the successor to Packet Python and is being used today to build the Equinix Ansible collection.
https://github.com/equinix-labs/ansible-collection-equinix/milestone/2

This was referenced Mar 6, 2024
ctreatma added a commit to equinix/equinix-sdk-python that referenced this issue Sep 6, 2024
This adds support for Equinix Metal by replicating the existing spec
patching and code generation processes from
[`metal-python`](https://github.com/equinix-labs/metal-python). This
ensures a smooth upgrade path for adopting `equinix-sdk-python` and
gaining access to other services supported by this SDK, and unblocks
packethost/packet-python#136.

The code added here does not align with Equinix or OpenAPI standards and
is subject to change. In particular, handling of additional properties
does not follow OpenAPI rules and must be fixed in a future release.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant