You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
We need to add MusicBrainz as a potential 024. The code given for Marc is mbrainz. However, this is not enough to resolve a link since we need the type. For BookBrainz, the codes are specific (e.g., bbrainza for authors, and bbrainzw for works), but this is not the case for MusicBrainz.
We could either ask for specific codes to be added, or use another subfield to add the type. Opinions or ideas?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
(internally, we can rely on the model to resolve it properly. That is, a 024 in works resolves to mbrainz/work/uuid, but that is probably not fully satisfactory from an external point of view)
I'd prefer that we approach them, to reach out but also for music to be more prominent. I thought I had a contact there (from an old conference?) but I can't find the name.
The other possibility is that $2 stays mbrainz and the identifier is artist/0383dadf-2a4e-4d10-a46a-e9e041da8eb3, etc.
We do this for our own identifiers, and it is trivial to expand mbrainz:artist/0383dadf-2a4e-4d10-a46a-e9e041da8eb3 to https://musicbrainz.org/artist/0383dadf-2a4e-4d10-a46a-e9e041da8eb3.
We need to add MusicBrainz as a potential 024. The code given for Marc is
mbrainz
. However, this is not enough to resolve a link since we need the type. For BookBrainz, the codes are specific (e.g.,bbrainza
for authors, andbbrainzw
for works), but this is not the case for MusicBrainz.We could either ask for specific codes to be added, or use another subfield to add the type. Opinions or ideas?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: