Argument named in
breaks the in
attriute in subsequent parameters (minor QoL thing)
#6318
Labels
goal:quality & productivity
Quality issues and issues that impact our productivity coding day to day inside slang
Milestone
Declaring a parameter named
in
seems to be legal, but it can glitch the parser:It looks like the name of parameter n affects how the annotations (or type name?) of parameters m > n are parsed, which doesn't seem like it should be a thing since those are different categories of identifier.
Not a blocker, more a QoL thing.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: