Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

What level of support should be provided for static resources? #47

Open
justinwb opened this issue Jun 12, 2021 · 0 comments
Open

What level of support should be provided for static resources? #47

justinwb opened this issue Jun 12, 2021 · 0 comments
Labels
question Further information is requested

Comments

@justinwb
Copy link
Contributor

From the specification:

An { ST rdfs:label L } arc indicates that there is at most one corresponding managed resource R in STI and it has the name L. L is a static resource.

To what extent should shape trees provide abilities (like the above) to express and validate static resources? Should we do it at all? Do we do it too little?

@justinwb justinwb added the question Further information is requested label Jun 12, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
question Further information is requested
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant