G-ness of ligatures

[gasyoun]

I have an issue to report about the results for the following input:

विस्तारितं मकरकेतनधीवरेण
	स्त्रीसंज्ञितं बडिशमत्र भवाम्बुराशौ ।
येनाचिरात्तदधरामिषलोलमर्त्य-
	मत्स्यान्विकृष्य विपचत्यनुरागवह्नौ ॥ ५३ ॥

When you say rtya should be G, does not the rty make it G already?

[shreevatsa]

This is what it shows:

The conjunct consonant "rty" makes the previous syllable (the "ma") G, but the complaint is about the last syllable of the line (the "rtya"). There are two points here:

• If we abandoned Sanskrit conventions of syllabification and wrote the syllables as, say, “mart-ya”, then it would be more clear that “ya” is L,

• It's actually OK for the last syllable to be L (as mentioned at विषमपादान्ते मा भूत् लघु गुरुस्थानि इति यन्त्रेण दर्श्यताम् श्लोक-उपजाति-वसन्ततिलक-भिन्न-वृत्तेषु #47 etc).