Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

refactor: force using stores in createAttributeDirective to avoid mistakes #1114

Merged

Conversation

divdavem
Copy link
Member

No description provided.

@divdavem divdavem force-pushed the createAttributeDirectiveStore branch from e29d551 to 210e5fd Compare February 19, 2025 16:17
Copy link

codecov bot commented Feb 19, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 91.21%. Comparing base (0997e15) to head (13609ea).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #1114      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   91.24%   91.21%   -0.04%     
==========================================
  Files          99       99              
  Lines        2708     2710       +2     
  Branches      446      446              
==========================================
+ Hits         2471     2472       +1     
  Misses        156      156              
- Partials       81       82       +1     
Flag Coverage Δ
e2e 82.83% <100.00%> (+0.01%) ⬆️
unit 84.27% <100.00%> (-0.04%) ⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@divdavem
Copy link
Member Author

@quentinderoubaix Thank you for your review!

@divdavem divdavem enabled auto-merge (squash) February 19, 2025 16:35
@divdavem divdavem merged commit 915f6cf into AmadeusITGroup:main Feb 19, 2025
15 of 16 checks passed
@divdavem divdavem deleted the createAttributeDirectiveStore branch February 21, 2025 13:21
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants