Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

staticdata: corrected implementation of jl_collect_new_roots #57407

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 14, 2025

Conversation

vtjnash
Copy link
Member

@vtjnash vtjnash commented Feb 14, 2025

This seems basically the same as #57212, but from computing and using method_roots_list wrong instead here (specifically the recursively part). Fix it by integrating jl_collect_new_roots with the places we actually need it.

Fixes #56994

@vtjnash vtjnash added the backport 1.12 Change should be backported to release-1.12 label Feb 14, 2025
@KristofferC KristofferC mentioned this pull request Feb 14, 2025
31 tasks
This seems basically the same as #57212, but from computing and using
`method_roots_list` wrong instead here (specifically the recursively
part). Fix it by integrating `jl_collect_new_roots` with the places we
actually need it.

Fixes #56994
@vtjnash vtjnash added the merge me PR is reviewed. Merge when all tests are passing label Feb 14, 2025
@fingolfin fingolfin merged commit f5f6d41 into master Feb 14, 2025
8 checks passed
@fingolfin fingolfin deleted the jn/56994 branch February 14, 2025 21:22
@giordano giordano removed the merge me PR is reviewed. Merge when all tests are passing label Feb 15, 2025
KristofferC pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 15, 2025
This seems basically the same as #57212, but from computing and using
`method_roots_list` wrong instead here (specifically the recursively
part). Fix it by integrating `jl_collect_new_roots` with the places we
actually need it.

Fixes #56994

(cherry picked from commit f5f6d41)
KristofferC added a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 17, 2025
Backported PRs:
- [x] #57346 <!-- lowering: Only try to define the method once -->
- [x] #57341 <!-- bpart: When backdating replace the entire bpart chain
-->
- [x] #57381 <!-- staticdata: Set min validation world to require world
-->
- [x] #57357 <!-- Only implicitly `using` Base, not Core -->
- [x] #57383 <!-- staticdata: Fix typo in recursive edge revalidation
-->
- [x] #57385 <!-- bpart: Move kind enum into its intended place -->
- [x] #57275 <!-- Compiler: fix unsoundness of getfield_tfunc on Tuple
Types -->
- [x] #57378 <!-- print admonition for auto-import only once per module
-->
- [x] #57392 <!-- [LateLowerGCFrame] fix PlaceGCFrameReset for
returns_twice -->
- [x] #57388 <!-- Bump JuliaSyntax to v1.0.2 -->
- [x] #57266 <!-- 🤖 [master] Bump the Statistics stdlib from d49c2bf to
77bd570 -->
- [x] #57395 <!-- lowering: fix has_fcall computation -->
- [x] #57204 <!-- Clarify mathematical definition of `gcd` -->
- [x] #56794 <!-- Make `Pairs` public -->
- [x] #57407 <!-- staticdata: corrected implementation of
jl_collect_new_roots -->
- [x] #57405 <!-- bpart: Also partition the export flag -->
- [x] #57420 <!-- Compiler: Fix check for IRShow definedness -->
- [x] #55875 <!-- fix `(-Inf)^-1` inconsistency -->
- [x] #57317 <!-- internals: add _defaultctor function for defining
ctors -->
- [x] #57406 <!-- bpart: Ignore guard bindings for ambiguity purposes
-->
- [x] #49933 <!-- Allow for :foreigncall to transition to GC safe
automatically -->
@KristofferC KristofferC removed the backport 1.12 Change should be backported to release-1.12 label Feb 17, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Failed assertion during IR decompression
4 participants