Flink: Replace use of deprecated methods #11658
Conversation
|
@pvary I started some cleanups in Flink tests. |
|
Why just these files/objects? I prefer a full removal of a method/class etc in a single PR. Otherwise we will end up with high number of small PRs which usually is a headache if internal versions are maintained. Don't we want to do a full migration from |
|
@pvary fair enough, let me "complete" this PR. |
nastra
changed the title
|
This pull request has been marked as stale due to 30 days of inactivity. It will be closed in 1 week if no further activity occurs. If you think that’s incorrect or this pull request requires a review, please simply write any comment. If closed, you can revive the PR at any time and @mention a reviewer or discuss it on the [email protected] list. Thank you for your contributions. |
|
This pull request has been closed due to lack of activity. This is not a judgement on the merit of the PR in any way. It is just a way of keeping the PR queue manageable. If you think that is incorrect, or the pull request requires review, you can revive the PR at any time. |
|
I will resume this "cleaning" on Flink (I'm focusing on Flink right now). |
This PR replaces use of deprecated method in Flink (1.20) tests.