Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

py-fuzzer: recommend using uvx rather than uv run to run the fuzzer #14645

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 27, 2024

Conversation

AlexWaygood
Copy link
Member

uvx --from=foo bar seems to accomplish the same thing as uv run --no-project --with=foo bar, but it's a fair bit less to type out on the command line

@AlexWaygood AlexWaygood added the internal An internal refactor or improvement label Nov 27, 2024
@AlexWaygood AlexWaygood enabled auto-merge (squash) November 27, 2024 22:17
@AlexWaygood AlexWaygood merged commit f1b2e85 into main Nov 27, 2024
21 checks passed
@AlexWaygood AlexWaygood deleted the alex/py-fuzzer-instructions branch November 27, 2024 22:19
Copy link
Contributor

ruff-ecosystem results

Linter (stable)

✅ ecosystem check detected no linter changes.

Linter (preview)

✅ ecosystem check detected no linter changes.

Formatter (stable)

✅ ecosystem check detected no format changes.

Formatter (preview)

✅ ecosystem check detected no format changes.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
internal An internal refactor or improvement
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant