-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 30
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Improve testing of contracts #450
Conversation
24f1cda
to
cd3a2ae
Compare
cd3a2ae
to
ba84370
Compare
d209e16
to
0c0a485
Compare
182185c
to
c05b87a
Compare
c05b87a
to
9a641a9
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I can't think of anything using the sw.os-image
contract so I'm not against it. About the tests, I'm afraid I don't know enough about the repo to review. If nobody else does let me know and I can unblock with an approval, but at least a js developer should ack I think.
Thank you, I thought you might say that, but I also wanted some ack that it was OK to remove the os-image contract. |
Change-type: patch
- Migrates contracts to typescript - Parallelizes scanning of folders and loading contracts - Adds validation for internal consistency of the contract universe Change-type: patch
9a641a9
to
072ab72
Compare
sw.os-image
contracts (which also interferes with internal consistency)Change-type: patch