Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

🌱 test: e2e: make managed suite more robust to errors with Eventually() #5215

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 31, 2025

Conversation

damdo
Copy link
Member

@damdo damdo commented Nov 13, 2024

What type of PR is this?
/kind flake

What this PR does / why we need it:
make managed suite more robust to errors with Eventually()

Special notes for your reviewer:
Trying to address issues like the ones seen here: https://prow.k8s.io/view/gs/kubernetes-ci-logs/pr-logs/pull/kubernetes-sigs_cluster-api-provider-aws/5211/pull-cluster-api-provider-aws-e2e-eks/1856371404925046784

NONE

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added release-note-none Denotes a PR that doesn't merit a release note. kind/flake Categorizes issue or PR as related to a flaky test. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. labels Nov 13, 2024
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added needs-priority size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Nov 13, 2024
@damdo
Copy link
Member Author

damdo commented Nov 13, 2024

/assign @richardcase @nrb

@damdo
Copy link
Member Author

damdo commented Nov 13, 2024

/test ?

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@damdo: The following commands are available to trigger required jobs:

  • /test pull-cluster-api-provider-aws-build
  • /test pull-cluster-api-provider-aws-build-docker
  • /test pull-cluster-api-provider-aws-test
  • /test pull-cluster-api-provider-aws-verify

The following commands are available to trigger optional jobs:

  • /test pull-cluster-api-provider-aws-apidiff-main
  • /test pull-cluster-api-provider-aws-e2e
  • /test pull-cluster-api-provider-aws-e2e-blocking
  • /test pull-cluster-api-provider-aws-e2e-clusterclass
  • /test pull-cluster-api-provider-aws-e2e-conformance
  • /test pull-cluster-api-provider-aws-e2e-conformance-with-ci-artifacts
  • /test pull-cluster-api-provider-aws-e2e-eks
  • /test pull-cluster-api-provider-aws-e2e-eks-gc
  • /test pull-cluster-api-provider-aws-e2e-eks-testing

Use /test all to run the following jobs that were automatically triggered:

  • pull-cluster-api-provider-aws-apidiff-main
  • pull-cluster-api-provider-aws-build
  • pull-cluster-api-provider-aws-build-docker
  • pull-cluster-api-provider-aws-test
  • pull-cluster-api-provider-aws-verify

In response to this:

/test ?

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@damdo
Copy link
Member Author

damdo commented Nov 13, 2024

/test pull-cluster-api-provider-aws-e2e-eks

@damdo
Copy link
Member Author

damdo commented Nov 13, 2024

Failed is unrelated (due to AWS CloudFormation stack)

/test pull-cluster-api-provider-aws-e2e-eks

@damdo
Copy link
Member Author

damdo commented Nov 13, 2024

/test pull-cluster-api-provider-aws-e2e-eks

2 similar comments
@damdo
Copy link
Member Author

damdo commented Nov 13, 2024

/test pull-cluster-api-provider-aws-e2e-eks

@damdo
Copy link
Member Author

damdo commented Nov 14, 2024

/test pull-cluster-api-provider-aws-e2e-eks

@damdo
Copy link
Member Author

damdo commented Nov 14, 2024

/test pull-cluster-api-provider-aws-test

@damdo
Copy link
Member Author

damdo commented Nov 14, 2024

/test pull-cluster-api-provider-aws-e2e-eks

1 similar comment
@damdo
Copy link
Member Author

damdo commented Nov 14, 2024

/test pull-cluster-api-provider-aws-e2e-eks

@damdo
Copy link
Member Author

damdo commented Nov 14, 2024

/test pull-cluster-api-provider-aws-e2e-eks

2 similar comments
@damdo
Copy link
Member Author

damdo commented Nov 15, 2024

/test pull-cluster-api-provider-aws-e2e-eks

@damdo
Copy link
Member Author

damdo commented Nov 15, 2024

/test pull-cluster-api-provider-aws-e2e-eks

@damdo
Copy link
Member Author

damdo commented Nov 15, 2024

AWS Cloud formation stack timed out

/test pull-cluster-api-provider-aws-e2e-eks

@damdo
Copy link
Member Author

damdo commented Nov 15, 2024

/test pull-cluster-api-provider-aws-e2e-eks

@damdo
Copy link
Member Author

damdo commented Nov 15, 2024

@richardcase do you have any idea on why waiting for addons fails so often?

@damdo
Copy link
Member Author

damdo commented Nov 20, 2024

/test pull-cluster-api-provider-aws-e2e-eks

@damdo
Copy link
Member Author

damdo commented Nov 21, 2024

/test pull-cluster-api-provider-aws-e2e-eks

@damdo
Copy link
Member Author

damdo commented Nov 22, 2024

/test pull-cluster-api-provider-aws-e2e-eks

@Ankitasw
Copy link
Member

@damdo since eventually failed for addons test in few runs, do you think we should increase the timeout from 2 minutes? Or is there any other issue?

@damdo
Copy link
Member Author

damdo commented Nov 26, 2024

/test pull-cluster-api-provider-aws-e2e-eks

1 similar comment
@damdo
Copy link
Member Author

damdo commented Nov 26, 2024

/test pull-cluster-api-provider-aws-e2e-eks

@damdo
Copy link
Member Author

damdo commented Nov 26, 2024

It still fails at Should've eventually succeeded creating an AWS CloudFormation stack

@damdo
Copy link
Member Author

damdo commented Nov 26, 2024

/test pull-cluster-api-provider-aws-e2e-eks

1 similar comment
@damdo
Copy link
Member Author

damdo commented Nov 26, 2024

/test pull-cluster-api-provider-aws-e2e-eks

@damdo
Copy link
Member Author

damdo commented Jan 27, 2025

/test pull-cluster-api-provider-aws-e2e-eks pull-cluster-api-provider-aws-e2e

@damdo
Copy link
Member Author

damdo commented Jan 27, 2025

This one is green, if you want to add your labels

/assing @nrb @richardcase

@nrb
Copy link
Contributor

nrb commented Jan 28, 2025

/test pull-cluster-api-provider-aws-e2e-eks pull-cluster-api-provider-aws-e2e

@damdo
Copy link
Member Author

damdo commented Jan 29, 2025

@nrb @AndiDog @Ankitasw tests are green if you want to stamp your approval. Thanks!

@nrb
Copy link
Contributor

nrb commented Jan 30, 2025

/approved
/lgtm

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jan 30, 2025
@damdo
Copy link
Member Author

damdo commented Jan 31, 2025

@nrb approve didn't stick, there is a typo in the command.

@damdo damdo requested a review from nrb January 31, 2025 09:09
@richardcase
Copy link
Member

/approve

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: richardcase

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Jan 31, 2025
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot merged commit 0d61f5b into kubernetes-sigs:main Jan 31, 2025
19 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. kind/flake Categorizes issue or PR as related to a flaky test. lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. needs-priority release-note-none Denotes a PR that doesn't merit a release note. size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants