Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Migrate formatting to use ruff #95

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Oct 8, 2024
Merged

Migrate formatting to use ruff #95

merged 2 commits into from
Oct 8, 2024

Conversation

mattwthompson
Copy link
Member

Description

Use ruff. Don't change much else.

Todos

Notable points that this PR has either accomplished or will accomplish.

  • Migrate formatting

Status

  • Ready to go

@codecov-commenter
Copy link

codecov-commenter commented Oct 8, 2024

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 0% with 4 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 90.50%. Comparing base (9755af2) to head (e803e65).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

Comment on lines -117 to 120
# TODO: This toolkit code that had a hack to cover some edge behavior; not clear which tests trigger it
# TODO: This toolkit code that had a hack to cover some edge behavior
# not clear which tests trigger it
elif isinstance(node, ast.List):
return ast.literal_eval(node)
Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This can be tracked down to openforcefield/openff-toolkit@551a2d5 where I believe this was used to parse lists of numbers, which is no longer something this package does

@mattwthompson mattwthompson merged commit 9e3078a into main Oct 8, 2024
38 checks passed
@mattwthompson mattwthompson deleted the ruff branch October 8, 2024 13:31
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants