Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Test #1472

Closed
wants to merge 49 commits into from
Closed

Test #1472

wants to merge 49 commits into from

Conversation

huqiuxiang
Copy link

@huqiuxiang huqiuxiang commented Feb 10, 2025

Motivation:

Explain the context, and why you're making that change.
To make others understand what is the problem you're trying to solve.

Modification:

Describe the idea and modifications you've done.

Result:

Fixes #.

If there is no issue then describe the changes introduced by this PR.

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores
    • Updated automation pipelines to enhance security, compliance, and code quality checks.
    • Removed legacy build and release workflows.
    • Upgraded dependencies to support improved XML binding and annotation features.
  • Documentation
    • Extended project documentation with a new placeholder section.
  • Tests
    • Introduced a new test file for additional validation.

@sofastack-cla sofastack-cla bot added cla:yes CLA is ok First-time contributor First-time contributor size/L labels Feb 10, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Feb 10, 2025

Walkthrough

This pull request updates several GitHub Actions workflows and dependency configurations. The cloud code scan workflow has its trigger events revised, while new workflows for FOSSA, SonarQube, and SOOS scans have been introduced—all targeting the master branch. Additionally, legacy Maven and release workflows have been removed. The changes also include a new, empty test section in the README, new dependency entries in multiple pom.xml files, and the addition of a new test file.

Changes

File(s) Change Summary
.github/workflows/cloud_code_scan.yml Modified trigger events: replaced pull_request_target with push and added pull_request for the master branch; commented out the old trigger.
.github/workflows/fossa_scan.yml,
.github/workflows/sonarqube_scan.yml,
.github/workflows/soos_scan.yml
New workflows added for FOSSA, SonarQube, and SOOS scans, each triggered on push and/or pull request events for the master branch.
.github/workflows/maven.yml,
.github/workflows/release.yml
Removed workflows previously used for Maven build, test, and release processes.
README.md Added a new, currently empty, section titled "##test".
pom.xml Added new dependencies: javax.xml.bind:jaxb-api (v2.3.1) and jakarta.annotation:jakarta.annotation-api (v2.0.0, scope provided); minor formatting updates.
registry/…/pom.xml Added dependency for javax.xml.bind:jaxb-api.
remoting/remoting-triple/pom.xml Added dependency for javax.annotation:javax.annotation-api (v1.3.2).
test_hqx Added new test file for the hqx module.

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant GitHub
    participant Runner as "Actions Runner"
    participant FOSSA as "FOSSA Action"
    
    GitHub->>Runner: Push/Pull Request on master
    Runner->>Runner: Checkout code (actions/checkout@v3)
    Runner->>FOSSA: Execute FOSSA scan (using API key)
    FOSSA-->>Runner: Return scan results
    Runner-->>GitHub: Report FOSSA scan outcome
Loading
sequenceDiagram
    participant GitHub
    participant Runner as "Actions Runner"
    
    GitHub->>Runner: Push event on master branch
    Runner->>Runner: Checkout code (actions/checkout@v2)
    Runner->>Runner: Setup JDK 17 (actions/setup-java@v2)
    Runner->>Runner: Run Maven command for SonarQube scan
    Runner-->>GitHub: Deliver SonarQube analysis results
Loading
sequenceDiagram
    participant GitHub
    participant Runner as "Actions Runner"
    participant SOOS as "SOOS Scan Action"
    
    GitHub->>Runner: Push/Pull Request on master
    Runner->>Runner: Checkout repository code
    Runner->>SOOS: Execute SOOS SCA analysis (with client_id & api_key)
    SOOS-->>Runner: Return scan results
    Runner-->>GitHub: Output SOOS scan report
Loading

Poem

I'm a little rabbit, code hopping with grace,
New workflows spring up in this digital space.
Scans and builds, all neatly aligned,
Old scripts out; bright new ones defined.
With carrots of code and joy in each trace!
🐇🥕


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@huqiuxiang huqiuxiang closed this Feb 10, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (8)
README.md (1)

57-58: Formatting: Fix ATX Heading Space

The new section heading "##test" does not have a space after the hash characters, which goes against Markdown style guidelines (MD018). Please update it to include a space (e.g. "## test") for proper formatting and readability.

🧰 Tools
🪛 markdownlint-cli2 (0.17.2)

57-57: No space after hash on atx style heading
null

(MD018, no-missing-space-atx)

pom.xml (1)

19-32: Improved Readability with Enhanced Spacing
The inclusion of additional blank lines in this section improves the readability and organization of the file. No action is needed.

.github/workflows/fossa_scan.yml (1)

14-16: Checkout Action Version Verification

The checkout step uses actions/checkout@v3. A static analysis hint flagged this version as potentially outdated. Please verify if a newer version (if available) should be used to ensure you receive the latest fixes and features.

🧰 Tools
🪛 actionlint (1.7.4)

15-15: the runner of "actions/checkout@v3" action is too old to run on GitHub Actions. update the action's version to fix this issue

(action)

.github/workflows/sonarqube_scan.yml (3)

1-2: Workflow Name Consistency and Clarity

Consider capitalizing the workflow name (for example, use "SonarQube Scan") for improved readability. This is a nitpicky suggestion.


10-11: Update Actions/Checkout Version

The checkout step currently uses actions/checkout@v2, which is flagged as outdated. Consider upgrading to actions/checkout@v3 to take advantage of recent improvements and fixes.

-    - uses: actions/checkout@v2
+    - uses: actions/checkout@v3
🧰 Tools
🪛 actionlint (1.7.4)

11-11: the runner of "actions/checkout@v2" action is too old to run on GitHub Actions. update the action's version to fix this issue

(action)


12-13: Update Java Setup Action

The workflow employs actions/setup-java@v2 to configure JDK 17. Upgrading to a newer version (e.g. actions/setup-java@v3 if available) would ensure you benefit from the latest updates and improvements.

-      uses: actions/setup-java@v2
+      uses: actions/setup-java@v3
🧰 Tools
🪛 actionlint (1.7.4)

13-13: the runner of "actions/setup-java@v2" action is too old to run on GitHub Actions. update the action's version to fix this issue

(action)

.github/workflows/cloud_code_scan.yml (1)

2-8: Trigger Event and YAML Formatting Cleanup

The trigger configuration correctly limits execution to push and pull_request events on the master branch. However, YAML lint reports indentation issues (lines 4 and 6) and trailing spaces (lines 7 and 8). Please adjust the indentation to be consistent (e.g., 2 spaces) and remove any extra trailing spaces.

-on:
-  push:
-      branches: [ master ]
-  pull_request:
-     branches: [ master ]
-     
-  #pull_request_target: 
+on:
+  push:
+    branches: [ master ]
+  pull_request:
+    branches: [ master ]
+  # pull_request_target: 
🧰 Tools
🪛 YAMLlint (1.35.1)

[warning] 4-4: wrong indentation: expected 4 but found 6

(indentation)


[warning] 6-6: wrong indentation: expected 4 but found 5

(indentation)


[error] 7-7: trailing spaces

(trailing-spaces)


[error] 8-8: trailing spaces

(trailing-spaces)

.github/workflows/soos_scan.yml (1)

21-22: Checkout Action Version Verification

This workflow uses actions/checkout@v3 to fetch repository content. As with other workflows, verify that this version meets current best practices, or consider upgrading if a newer version is recommended.

-      - uses: actions/checkout@v3
+      - uses: actions/checkout@v4  # if available, otherwise verify the recommended version
🧰 Tools
🪛 actionlint (1.7.4)

22-22: the runner of "actions/checkout@v3" action is too old to run on GitHub Actions. update the action's version to fix this issue

(action)

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between be93251 and c7b9ebd.

📒 Files selected for processing (11)
  • .github/workflows/cloud_code_scan.yml (1 hunks)
  • .github/workflows/fossa_scan.yml (1 hunks)
  • .github/workflows/maven.yml (0 hunks)
  • .github/workflows/release.yml (0 hunks)
  • .github/workflows/sonarqube_scan.yml (1 hunks)
  • .github/workflows/soos_scan.yml (1 hunks)
  • README.md (1 hunks)
  • pom.xml (2 hunks)
  • registry/registry-local/pom.xml (1 hunks)
  • remoting/remoting-triple/pom.xml (1 hunks)
  • test_hqx (1 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (2)
  • .github/workflows/release.yml
  • .github/workflows/maven.yml
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
  • test_hqx
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 YAMLlint (1.35.1)
.github/workflows/cloud_code_scan.yml

[warning] 4-4: wrong indentation: expected 4 but found 6

(indentation)


[warning] 6-6: wrong indentation: expected 4 but found 5

(indentation)


[error] 7-7: trailing spaces

(trailing-spaces)


[error] 8-8: trailing spaces

(trailing-spaces)

🪛 actionlint (1.7.4)
.github/workflows/fossa_scan.yml

15-15: the runner of "actions/checkout@v3" action is too old to run on GitHub Actions. update the action's version to fix this issue

(action)

.github/workflows/sonarqube_scan.yml

11-11: the runner of "actions/checkout@v2" action is too old to run on GitHub Actions. update the action's version to fix this issue

(action)


13-13: the runner of "actions/setup-java@v2" action is too old to run on GitHub Actions. update the action's version to fix this issue

(action)

.github/workflows/soos_scan.yml

22-22: the runner of "actions/checkout@v3" action is too old to run on GitHub Actions. update the action's version to fix this issue

(action)

🪛 markdownlint-cli2 (0.17.2)
README.md

57-57: No space after hash on atx style heading
null

(MD018, no-missing-space-atx)

⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (1)
  • GitHub Check: sca
🔇 Additional comments (11)
remoting/remoting-triple/pom.xml (1)

19-23: New Dependency Addition: javax.annotation-api
The new dependency for javax.annotation:javax.annotation-api at version 1.3.2 is added correctly here. Please verify that this version is compatible with other annotation libraries in the project (e.g. the jakarta.annotation-api used elsewhere) to avoid potential conflicts.

registry/registry-local/pom.xml (1)

16-19: New Dependency Addition: jaxb-api
A new dependency for javax.xml.bind:jaxb-api has been introduced. Notice that no version is specified here. If version management is handled in a parent POM or through dependencyManagement, this is fine; otherwise, consider specifying a version (e.g. 2.3.1) to ensure consistent builds.

pom.xml (2)

68-73: New Dependency in Dependency Management: jaxb-api
The dependency for javax.xml.bind:jaxb-api at version 2.3.1 is added in the dependencyManagement section to ensure consistency across modules. Please double-check that this version requirement aligns with those expected by all modules relying on XML binding.


74-80: New Dependency in Dependency Management: jakarta.annotation-api
The added dependency for jakarta.annotation:jakarta.annotation-api at version 2.0.0 with scope provided appears appropriate for managing annotation requirements as projects migrate from legacy Java EE libraries. Confirm that modules dependent on annotation APIs refer to this dependency consistently.

.github/workflows/fossa_scan.yml (2)

1-8: Trigger Configuration Validation

The workflow is correctly set to trigger on both push and pull_request events targeting the master branch. This matches the intended behavior for running FOSSA scans on changes.


17-22: FOSSA Scan Step Configuration

The FOSSA scan step is configured properly, with the API key securely referenced from repository secrets. The commented-out args parameter is a helpful hint for future customizations.

.github/workflows/sonarqube_scan.yml (2)

3-4: Trigger Configuration

The workflow is set to trigger on push events to the master branch. This aligns with the intended use for SonarQube scans.


19-20: Maven Build and SonarQube Analysis

The Maven command properly cleans, verifies, and performs SonarQube analysis while appropriately skipping tests. Double-check that the secrets (SONARQUBE_HOST and SONARQUBE_TOKEN) are correctly configured.

.github/workflows/cloud_code_scan.yml (1)

9-28: Job Definitions for Security Scanning and Compliance

The jobs for stc (security scanning) and sca (open-source compliance) are clearly defined and correctly reference the necessary secrets. Ensure that these secrets are properly set up in the repository settings.

.github/workflows/soos_scan.yml (2)

1-4: Workflow Documentation and Trigger Explanation

The workflow is well-documented with comments that describe its purpose and execution triggers. The events (push and pull_request on master) are clearly specified, which is ideal for targeted SOOS SCA analysis.


25-31: SOOS SCA Analysis Step Configuration

The SOOS SCA Analysis step is clearly set up with all the required parameters and secrets. Ensure that the placeholder <repository_owner>/<repository_name> in project_name is updated to reflect your repository context, or consider using the variable ${{ github.repository }} directly.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
cla:yes CLA is ok First-time contributor First-time contributor size/L
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant