Create 20025-01-17.md

safety/2025/20025-01-17.md

@@ -0,0 +1,33 @@
+# SPDX FuSa Team Meeting 20025-01-17
+## Attendees
+- Steven Carbno
+- Alfred Strauch
+- Nicole Pappler
+- Chuck Wolber
+- Kate Stewart
+
+## Agenda
+Review V2 of Action Methology 
+* Discuss questions presented in the methodology
+* https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1-8kGO4zEDJd-A7KqJ3kBVyDhPQIbyQPoXyEFlRdx10s/edit?usp=sharing
+Discuss the decomposition of process
+* How do you identify the events to be captured for sharing
+
+## Notes
+* Reviewed idea of a specific object (product) being associated with an action (event).
+Concrete objects are instanciations
+Abstract objects are types of products
+* An abstract object (type) is defined in process.
+* AM template define industry requirements for communication and standardization
+* It was suggested the abstract model is all that is required for defining proceesses as oppose to the need for a template (plan as suggested by Kate)
+* A discussion related to process and requirements identification was started. The issue being how do processes related to a domain, between domains and on a dimenssional level
+* Chuck suggested that the methodology is a Functional Design Assusrance process. 
+* Suggested that all SC are an assurance concept 
+* Assurance confidence levels determine the datails and requirements captured in any moel
+* Process engineering concepts are used as part of the AM mapping of processes and requirements 
+
+## Decisions
+* The AM works but we need to clearly or define various types and issues.
+
+## Action Items
+* Suggested FuSa team attend the HBOM/SC meetings to merge ideas