Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

update RDF dataset discussion #151

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from
+4 −2
Open

update RDF dataset discussion #151

Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
1 commit
Select commit
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
6 changes: 4 additions & 2 deletions spec/index.html
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -1021,11 +1021,13 @@ <h2>RDF Datasets</h2>
can avoid interoperability issues by not ascribing importance to
the presence or absence of empty named graphs.</p>

<p>SPARQL 1.2 [[SPARQL12-QUERY]] uses
<p>Version 1.2 of the SPARQL Query Language [[SPARQL12-QUERY]] uses
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It's all SPARQL specs which is why it says SPARQL 1.2.

The link is provided because that is the starting point. Arguably, the link could be removed.

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The link is provided because that is the starting point. Arguably, the link could be removed.

It seems odd for [SPARQL12-QUERY] to be the starting point.

[SPARQL12-CONCEPTS] or possibly [SPARQL12-NEW] makes more sense to me, and not only because these are listed before [SPARQL12-QUERY] in the List of Documents (to which I cannot find a way to link directly, nor to auto-expand after load)

It's all SPARQL specs which is why it says SPARQL 1.2.

It seems to me, this lends weight to linking to [SPARQL12-CONCEPTS] or possibly [SPARQL12-NEW] instead of [SPARQL12-QUERY].

Removing the link is indeed also an option.

<a data-cite="SPARQL12-QUERY#sparqlDataset">the same concept of an RDF Dataset</a>
as RDF versions 1.1 and 1.2,
in which the graph names of named graphs may be IRIs or blank nodes.
In contrast, version 1.1 of the SPARQL Query Language [[SPARQL11-QUERY]]
only allows IRIs as graph names.</p>
and RDF version 1.0
only allowed graph names to be IRIs.</p>
Comment on lines +1029 to +1030
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Better to remove this.

RDF 1.0 didn't mention datasets at all nor were they concurrent.
This is a note. RDF 1.1 is 10 years old.


</div>

Expand Down
Loading