-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Disease-Gene exclusions #180
Changes from all commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -0,0 +1,8 @@ | ||
omim_id mondo_id mondo_label orcid exclusion_reason_comment | ||
OMIM:603956 MONDO:0002974 cervical cancer' https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4142-7153 evidence of various genes involved | ||
OMIM:619151 MONDO:0030894 "AMED syndrome, digenic'" https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4142-7153 digenic | ||
OMIM:158901 MONDO:0008031 https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4142-7153 digenic | ||
OMIM:108770 MONDO:0007171 atrial standstill 1' https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4142-7153 digenic | ||
OMIM:620040 MONDO:0031057 "dyskeratosis congenita, digenic'" https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4142-7153 digenic | ||
OMIM:619478 MONDO:0030355 "facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy 4, digenic'" https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4142-7153 digenic | ||
OMIM:300818 MONDO:0010438 paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria 1 https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4142-7153 "disease caused by a somatic mutation, therefore a gene association stating this is due to a germline mutation should not be added" | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. There are no disease to gene associations on any of these diseases (OMIM phenotypes) now. There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Indeed! |
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
|
@@ -24,6 +24,7 @@ WHERE { | |
|
||
FILTER( | ||
?PredUri IN ( | ||
<http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/RO_0003302>, | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. For completeness, good to add in case any analysis comparisons of the data ever look at the other gene association properties other than the disease-defining property. |
||
<http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/RO_0003303>, | ||
<http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/RO_0003304>, | ||
<http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/RO_0004013>, | ||
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
To explain the HGNC removals in the diff.diff file using this as an example. When creating the omim.owl file from the omim.ttl file, there is a step in the make goal that adds the hgnc links where there is a disease2gene association represented with RO:0004003. Since this disease no longer has the RO:0004003 association and the gene ADH5 is not used as a disease-defining gene for any other disease it does not get converted to a HGNC identifier. The same thing happens with
OMIM:620040 MONDO:0031057 "dyskeratosis congenita, digenic'"
.If you open the omim-b4.owl and omim-after.owl files in Protege and go to the Object properties tab and check the Usage of RO:0003302 it's easy to see where the new associations exist that use the property (the number is small enough to not need to sparql this information). And looking at the gene entry in Protege, you can also check which of these genes that now have the RO:0003302 association also still have other disease-defining associations for other diseases.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Really glad you looked into the HGNC stuff! Thanks. I was thinking that might be the case.
Also, good Protégé tips!