chore: uplift to polkadot 2412

[peterwht]

Uplifts to Stable 2412.

Due to dependency issues with asset-hub-westend-runtime with the 2412 release, integration-tests have been included from the workspace. The integration tests have been updated and confirmed to pass.

Relevant PRs causing node changes

• Use bool::then instead of then_some with function calls paritytech/polkadot-sdk#6156
• fork-aware transaction pool added paritytech/polkadot-sdk#4639
• substrate-offchain: upgrade hyper to v1 paritytech/polkadot-sdk#5919

Relevant PRs causing runtime changes

• Remove sp_runtime::RuntimeString and replace with Cow<'static, str> or String depending on use case paritytech/polkadot-sdk#5693
• FRAME: Reintroduce TransactionExtension as a replacement for SignedExtension paritytech/polkadot-sdk#3685
  • this includes a change to dispatch_info changing to hold call_weight and extension_weight

TODOs (in follow up PRs, non-blocking for this PR)

• Add pallet-revive feat(mainnet): add revive [DON'T MERGE] #427
• Add xcm_runtime_apis: feat(mainnet): add XCM runtime APIs, config tests, and refactor to API mod [DON'T MERGE]  #426
• Add SystemExtensionsBench | FRAME: Reintroduce TransactionExtension as a replacement for SignedExtension paritytech/polkadot-sdk#3685
  • feat(mainnet): include pallets in define_benchmarks and remove default configs #435

[codecov-commenter]

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 22.34043% with 73 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 71.28%. Comparing base (5c4b865) to head (937ca11).

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
runtime/devnet/src/config/api/versioning.rs	0.00%	15 Missing ⚠️
runtime/testnet/src/config/api/versioning.rs	0.00%	15 Missing ⚠️
node/src/command.rs	0.00%	13 Missing ⚠️
node/src/service.rs	0.00%	12 Missing ⚠️
node/src/chain_spec.rs	0.00%	6 Missing ⚠️
pallets/nfts/src/features/transfer.rs	0.00%	2 Missing ⚠️
pallets/nfts/src/impl_nonfungibles.rs	0.00%	2 Missing ⚠️
primitives/src/lib.rs	88.23%	2 Missing ⚠️
extension/src/functions.rs	80.00%	0 Missing and 1 partial ⚠️
pallets/nfts/src/benchmarking.rs	0.00%	1 Missing ⚠️
... and 4 more

@@                               Coverage Diff                               @@
##           chore-upgrade-pop-net-to-stable2412/sc-1940     #425      +/-   ##
===============================================================================
- Coverage                                        71.35%   71.28%   -0.07%     
===============================================================================
  Files                                               72       72              
  Lines                                            13592    13626      +34     
  Branches                                         13592    13626      +34     
===============================================================================
+ Hits                                              9698     9713      +15     
- Misses                                            3627     3646      +19     
  Partials                                           267      267              

Files with missing lines	Coverage Δ
extension/src/lib.rs	94.23% <100.00%> (ø)
pallets/api/src/mock.rs	100.00% <ø> (ø)
pallets/nfts/src/common_functions.rs	90.25% <100.00%> (ø)
extension/src/functions.rs	92.41% <80.00%> (ø)
pallets/nfts/src/benchmarking.rs	85.79% <0.00%> (ø)
pallets/nfts/src/lib.rs	70.77% <0.00%> (ø)
runtime/devnet/src/lib.rs	5.44% <0.00%> (ø)
runtime/mainnet/src/lib.rs	21.44% <0.00%> (ø)
runtime/testnet/src/lib.rs	6.29% <0.00%> (ø)
pallets/nfts/src/features/transfer.rs	83.68% <0.00%> (ø)
... and 7 more

[Daanvdplas]

Changes looking good, I faced a similar issue with the integration tests when I made similar changes to the Cargo.toml file. Left a few things and also curious what the order of things will be with the linked PRs?

[al3mart]

The uplift looks pretty good! looking forward to seeing the CI green!

As it has been discussed off github there are a few improvements that can be made to the mainnet runtime. But having this PR only taking care of the sdk sync makes sense to me.

I'm happy to take care of working on pushing those runtime changes, @peterwht

[Daanvdplas]

Approving as this needs to get wrapped up but could we add a story for creating a message to twitter and telegram regarding the new TrieError.